Comments for The Cutest Human-Test: KittenAuth

31 to 40 of 215 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 20 21 22 >
#31 /* 2 years, 5 months ago */
My first post attempt didn't work. I clicked the three kittens, but no post was added, and no errors.
#32 /* 2 years, 5 months ago */
A safer way would be to let someone click on the eyes of the kittens, just like 'picture password' (google...) This would decrease the odds of false positives dramatically!
#33 /* 2 years, 5 months ago */
Some foolish ideas that you have probably already discared can be found here: http://blog.chipsochdip.se/2006/04/07/kittenauth/

:)
#34 /* 2 years, 5 months ago */
did someone already say this?

this is neat, BUT, you are going to run out of novel kitten images.. so, over time, a bot could be designed to catalog and collect ALL of the in-use kitten images.. or even a significant portion would be OK..

then, its not hard to image-match computationally... so, your system would be busted.

yes?

Zane
#35 — Author comment /* 2 years, 5 months ago */
One word for you: Flickr.

You just download all the images under the kitten tag, take a zoomed chunk out of them and use these as one weeks batch. Next week its all different.

This example does have a very limited source collection and I'm limited on what I can do server-side because of the volumes of people viewing this.

In an ideal world I'd be running on a 32-core opteron server where I could just generate permutations of the images all day long -- But this is the inherant tradeoff of this system. Its only as good as its webmaster until we can find some way to automate the image harvesting technique.

The flickr API will no-doubt come in much use in the coming days for doing daily/weekly batch downloads and processing for new images.
#36 /* 2 years, 5 months ago */
Why 3 kittens? Just say click on all kittens in the grid and you get 495 possible sets.
#37 /* 2 years, 5 months ago */
Great idea. Looking at some of the negative responses in the comments, it might be worth adding a para in your article to incorporate some of the improvements that people have mentioned already (just coz clearly lots of people don't read through the comments).
All of the attacks that people make on identifying a limited number of kitty images are irrelevant, because a solution has been proposed whereby you could change the identifier dynamically by having separate groupings of images.
I wonder how well you could get away with creating a random image cache by using different google image searches. So that: a) your images are not hosted on your own server, and b) your collection of images can't really be learned.
Admittedly, a problem with this is that the images returned by google on different searches may not all be that obvious... but hey, its a rough idea.
#38 /* 2 years, 5 months ago */
What about "click on all pictures that are upside down" Then the same pictures can be used for both true and false.
#39 /* 2 years, 5 months ago */
I've always that that image identification would be neat -- something like "What is this?", then a picture of a car. If they user types "car", then they are granted access. You could have multiple images of the same thing. The point here is that you never give out the set of words you draw from.
#40 /* 2 years, 5 months ago */
Scenario:
I am blind, and using a screen reader.


Result:
Unable to comment on your website because I can't see what is a kitten and what isn't.


Conclusion:
This is not an accessible solution, and is just as bad as CAPTCHA techniques.


Consolation:
It's a pretty nifty idea.
31 to 40 of 215 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 20 21 22 >
Home | Advertise | About | Contact | Legal © Oli Warner 2001—2007 Proud 9rules member