Microsoft: Old Versions Are Rubbish

By Oli on Friday, 24th November 2006. More information. Comments.

Microsoft, in an interview with the BBC, have said in no uncertain terms that it's aim is convince people that older (than latest) versions of their software are redundant. Chris Capossela, corporate vice president of...

Microsoft, in an interview with the BBC, have said in no uncertain terms that it's aim is convince people that older (than latest) versions of their software are redundant. Chris Capossela, corporate vice president of the Microsoft Business Division, said:

One of the biggest challenges... is to fight that perception that old versions of software are good enough,

[...]

Our business model of course allows you to keep using Office 2003 - the software doesn't really expire,

Am I the only person that finds this sort of practice a little worrying? This is not the only example of Microsoft doing this sort of cripple-ware. Windows XP did bring several improvements to the desktop but with it Microsoft have limited some of their client software to only run on it (MSN Messenger v7+ for example).

DirectX 10 (the next-generation performance hardware abstraction layer for programmers to utilise hardware to it's limits and provide the best gaming experiences) has also been crippled so that it will only run on Windows Vista (the next version of Windows). After that, any game that required DX10 to run also requires Vista.

He went on to say [talking about retraining for Office 2007]:

The people who take longer are the die-hard users; the expert Excel user

Another sign that Microsoft have screwed up Office 2007. They admit that it's going to take the longest to learn for people that know the older versions best. Considering the interface for office has been nigh-on identical for the last 10 versions, a lot of people are going to find themselves going "where is feature x now?" I know that's what I'm experiencing with Office 2007. Moreover the people with the expensive certifications in programming Office are going to find themselves needing to enter into another long bout of (expensive) retraining.

Companies, especially smaller ones are definitely going to need to look hard at the pros and cons of 'upgrading either operating system or office' vs 'moving to an open platform' as there are several potentially expensive problems staying with a pure MS solution.

Grav

Written by Oli on Friday, 24 November 2006. Tagged with microsoft, office, technology. Read 2837 times. If you liked it, please give it a digg.

#1 /* 16 months, 0 days ago */
Surely Office 2007 is in violation of the tradepractices act ? It is so different to use from previous uses that it is false advertising to call it Office 2007.
#2 /* 8 months, 26 days ago */
I have just had office 2007 installed by the IT department. its awful, crashes constantly, is incompatible with several programs used by the office and overall is difficult to use as I don’t find any logical design behind the interface.
Outcome – I have just asked for 2003 to be put back on and 2007 deleted my computer. All other team members are about to do the same.
#3 /* 19 days, 18 hours ago */
I've got Office 2007 on my laptop, I've tried repeatedly to get to grips with it but without success it is extremely user unfriendly & I wouldn't recommend anybody use this application. I shall be reinstalling Office 2003 and stick with that from now on. Hopefully Microsoft will do a better job of gathering user requirements in the future before knocking out an application that is a complete waste of time and money.

Don't just sit there like a lemon! Reply!

Got something to say? Now's the time to share it with the author and everybody else that reads this posting! Lemons need not apply.

edtBOX - xHTML: yes - bbcode:no
Home | Advertise | About | Contact | Legal © Oli Warner 2001—2007 Proud 9rules member