3 moments in Vista that make me consider Linux

Vista can be really useless at times.
By Oli on Thursday, 06th September 2007. More information. Comments.

While I definitely think some elements of Vista are definite improvements, 10 months of experience has shown me there are some things that just annoy me to my very core. Here are the three things that most make me wish I had the strength to move over to Linux — full time.

While I definitely think some elements of Vista are definite improvements, 10 months of experience has shown me there are some things that just annoy me to my very core. Here are the three things that most make me wish I had the strength to move over to Linux — full time.

1. Explorer crashing over and over and over and over and over again

This is a legacy Windows issue that has always plagued me. Scrolling through huge directories and even just downloading something that Windows doesn't like can cause explorer.exe to start thinking emo thoughts and take its own life. While this doesn't usually mean I lose any work, it can frustrate the hell out of me if I'm doing something with several complicated paths and it means I have to start all over again.

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

The cause of the above video is a codec issue but my point when I mentioned it was that Explorer, as the shell for Windows, should be nigh on bullet-proof. Instead we've had 6 major versions of Windows where a squirrel farting 200 miles away can topple it.

2. Included software being criminally rubbish

While there are many examples of this decay in Windows, the CD/DVD burning wizard from XP that has travelled into Vista with just as many issue is the particular example I cite for this claim. The only magic this wizard has ever shown it transfiguring perfectly good media into little steaming piles of bork.

CD and DVD burning STILL sucks.

This is something that should have been fixed in XP SP2. As it is in Vista only 1-in-10 attempts actually works for me. To compound my problem and escalate this into a fully-blown issue, the very excellent and free CDBurnerXP doesn't support Vista yet.

This, along with many other small applications included with Windows demonstrate the abuse of time and complacency. It may work for a small subset of users but the inadequacy of included software drives people to buy 3rd party software to get a relatively simple task accomplished.

Under Linux there is a plethora of highly functional burning apps, some commercial but the best of breed belonging to open source. FOSS allows people to take existing projects and improve them and while Windows has stagnated, their applications have become wildly powerful and in many cases, best of breed on any platform.

3. The DRM is getting me down.

While I usually argue that driver-incompatibility is not Microsoft's fault due to hardware vendors having access to Vista for well over a year now, plenty of the changes that have had to be made to drivers wouldn't be needed if Microsoft hadn't turned Vista into the world's biggest software DRM platform.

Vista features layer-upon-layer of hardware and software monitoring so that media apps can "trust" the route through from storage media through to the screen. If a system cannot be trusted (through incompatible/untrusted hardware) the media is distorted into a poorer quality version.

And all this monitoring requires hardware to power it. Performance that could be used to run the system is being syphoned off to ensure that I'm not doing something with media I'm not supposed to. Microsoft effectively said it was okay to waste the hardware of users on the whim of media companies — something that doesn't sit right by me. DRM is pointless and ineffective yet some percentage of my system resources are paying that tax regardless of my actions.

And yet I still use it...

For all its faults and shortcomings, I like Windows. It's an unfortunate predicament isn't it?

I'm sure that most of it is experience — knowing where things are — but another large chunk is that I also know the applications I use. In many circumstances, I know I could migrate to alternative applications on a Linux OS but there are a similar number of applications that I rely on which I deem best of breed. Some are Microsoft programs like Visual Studio, some are games which don't operate under Linux, at least not to the same levels as they work natively in Windows.

The question I keep asking myself as I look jealously at the latest Linux releases is: how long will I force myself to use Windows?

Grav

Written by Oli on Thursday, 06 September 2007. Tagged with windows, vista, linux. Read 7644 times. If you liked it, please give it a digg.

1 to 10 of 33 < 1 2 3 4 >
#1 /* 2 years, 10 months ago */
Ouch that doesn't look like much fun.... :-)
#2 /* 2 years, 10 months ago */
I installed Vista on my Media PC thinking I might enjoy the newer MCE software 2 days later the only thing I was watching on my Media PC was a Windows XP Install screen.

I won't install windows vista again ever. I'll stick with XP it works. If I buy a prebuild system again and it comes with Vista I'll give it a try but there will be a vista sp2 by the time I buy a new PC.
Nate
#3 /* 2 years, 10 months ago */
I am also wondering why you would try to burn 10 times before giving up? When I first got my current dell I burned one DVD it failed I looked up the model number online and found out it was a crap drive. Called dell the tech support guy he asked me to try stuff and burn about 3 DVDs I of course didn't waste my disks and just told him it failed to burn. Got a different brand drive in about a week. Installed it and haven't waisted a disk since. I tried burner built into windows xp once on my old computer the CD failed and I never tried it again. Disks are cheap but because of my Children's lack of discipline (2 year old) I have to keep all my computer disks in another room.
Nate
#4 — Author comment /* 2 years, 10 months ago */
There are two modes of burning in Vista. There's the RAM-Disc/multisession approach that allows you to add files and the disc-at-once one where it writes all the files and finalises at the end. The multisession burning did work but it's incompatible with the DVD player I was trying to use the discs on. The DAO method is the criminally poor, hardly ever works method but it is compatible...

I guess I was just being an optimist expecting it to work if I tried it enough=)
#5 /* 2 years, 10 months ago */
I tried Vista. The machine was an AMD64 3.4Gig, 1GIG RAM, all nvidia motherboard etc. With Vista - not everything worked correctly out of the box, drivers from box makers website were not fully functional, constant hard drive thrashing, programs taking up to, and in some cases, over a minute to load, constant crashing, games crashing, apps that wouldn't work at all, installed and then didn't work and so on. Despite being well able to cope with transparent window borders on Linux, Vista reported that part of the system "was not up to spec for Aero" and so it was disabled, enabling it made a noticable hit on the desktop response time. A complete nightmare. Quite the worst thing Microsoft have ever come out with in terms of an Operating System - on a level with that damned paperclip in Office. A truly stressful and horrid experience.

On the same box - Ubuntu Linux - everything works out of the box except 3d drivers which are easy to enable, hasn't crashed yet, flies like a hawk on speed, games play fine, apps take a couple of seconds to open. Beryl - the 3d window manager, works like a dream with many many more effects than Aero and all work without making the tiniest bit of difference to the system response times. It is a delight to use.

This is, I think, what the Americans would call "a no brainer".
#6 /* 2 years, 10 months ago */
To me there is only one way to run a computer.

1--Get a linux installation ( may take some time before you find the distro you like, and some more time to know what the heck you are doing-------I am NOT talking about the default install: that's a breeze )

2--get a) VMware or VirtualBox or Paralles workstaton or other type of virtualisation.
again, this takes some time

3--Install the kind of windows you like....

I was with windows from DOS3.....I do linux for 4 years.....I enjoy the best of 2 worlds.

As I said, it takes some time to " re-learn ".
But " re-learn " time is no longer that fixing 'things' and ' maintaining '
#7 /* 2 years, 10 months ago */
I had a system running Vista Ultimate that was connected to a video network that had a DVR and cameras at four different locations and I spent more time saying yes to stuff than anything else. The only real improvement was in the parental controls, which we used for non-admin user control.
#8 /* 2 years, 10 months ago */
I started my journey into Linux 6 years ago now, moving to using it full time at work 2 years ago. I work in the IT field and my position lets me decide what operating system to use without any windows monkey IT support staff forcing me to stick with microsoft's offerings, as happens in so many other companies.

There are sadly still some applications that I need to run in windows, for these I use Innotek's Virtualbox with XP sp2.

Linux has so many benefits it is hard not to talk about them without sounding like a fanboy, but once you adjust yourself from the windows way of doing things to Linux way of doing things you can really start to reap the rewards! You may then truly understand that the free in free software is not just the price but that the free cost is just the tip of the iceberg in to what it truly means and the many positive implications it has. I shall not lie it was a bumpy road that needed time to learn new things, but well worth it and with the progress Linux has made since the short time I have being using it that road has been smoothed out enormously.but that that is just the tip of the iceberb in to what it truly means and the many positive implications it has. I shall not lie it was a bumpy road but well worth it and with the progress Linux has made since I have used it hat road has been smoothed out enormous
#9 /* 2 years, 10 months ago */
The question I keep asking myself as I look jealously at the latest Linux releases is: how long will I force myself to use Windows?


Meh. If my parents, co-workers and nephew can migrate, so can you. Install Linux, install a virtual machine package (VMWare, VirtualBox*, whatever). Istall XP as a virtual machine and burn your Vista discs. If you have the hardware run Vista, you have the hardware to run XP as a virtual machine.

* The new VirtualBox can seemlessly integrate Windows apps on the Linux desktop, much like OSX's Parallels. I.e, you don't see the Windows desktop at all. You see the Windows app on your Linux desktop like any Linux app would.
#10 /* 2 years, 10 months ago */
Return to windows XP.
1 to 10 of 33 < 1 2 3 4 >

Don't just sit there like a lemon! Reply!

Got something to say? Now's the time to share it with the author and everybody else that reads this posting! Lemons need not apply.

edtBOX - xHTML: yes - bbcode:no
Home | Advertise | About | Contact | Legal © Oli Warner 2001—2007 Proud 9rules member